THIS COURSE WILL BE OFFERED IN SPRING 2009.
Some good links:
How Chinese characters evolved, work, and are misunderstood
EAL&L 683 SCRIPTS OF
Call No. 02598-7
Time: MW 1:30–3:18
Classroom: HH 046
1. Overview
This goal of this interdisciplinary course is to provide a critical response to well-known claims about the uniqueness of Chinese characters. It begins with a consideration of the relationship between writing and language in general, emphasizing the primacy of speech in linguistic behavior. Against this background, students learn about the history, structure, and use of the Chinese and “Sino-Xenic” (i.e. Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese) writing systems. These facts show that writing systems all over the world have more in common than the superficial differences among graphic form would lead one to think. Despite this, however, false claims about Chinese characters have been highly influential in many different fields, including linguistics, psychology, pedagogical theory, literary and esthetic criticism, information technology, and public policy. The remainder of the course is devoted to charting those influences and seeing how a correct understanding of East Asian writing systems helps to overcome the misunderstandings they cause.
This course is aimed at students majoring in Chinese, Japanese, Korean,
Linguistics, Comparative Studies, and disciplines in which semiology
(semiotics) is central issue (e.g. Philosophy, Computer Science). Because of
the heterogeneous background of students taking the course, it will be
sufficiently general to accommodate undergraduates approaching graduation but
demanding enough for graduate students.
It will consist of lectures and discussions that either clarify the
operation of writing systems, both in general and in
Grades will be determined by class participation (35%), and the final paper (65%). Final grades will be assigned to convey the instructor’s assessment of the student’s success and readiness to proceed to the next higher level of study: D or E means the student is unready to take a more advanced course in the same subject, the difference being that a D recognizes effort by conferring credit; higher grades show that a student is qualified for more advanced study, and that the instructor believes s/he will easily excel (A), do well with effort (B), or experience considerable difficulty (C) if s/he chooses to do so. Grades and quantitative evaluations of performance correspond as follows:
Points
Grade Points
Grade
92–100
A
76–79
C+
89–91
A–
72–75
C
86–88
B+
69–71
C–
82–85
B
66–67
D+
79–81
B–
62–65
D
2. Syllabus
|
3/30 |
M |
Introductory
discussion |
|
4/1 |
W |
DeFrancis,
Introduction and chs. 1–3 |
|
4/6 |
M |
DeFrancis, 4–7;
Supplement #13 |
|
4/8 |
W |
DeFrancis chs.
8–9 |
|
4/13 |
M |
Supplement ##0, 5
(skim) |
|
4/15 |
W |
DeFrancis ch. 10 |
|
4/20 |
M |
Supplement #14 |
|
4/23 |
W |
DeFrancis chs.
11–13; Supplement #10 |
|
4/27 |
M |
DeFrancis chs.
14–15; Supplement #12 |
|
4/29 |
W |
The Medium is the Massage side A |
|
5/4 |
M |
The Medium is the Massage side B |
|
5/6 |
W |
Unger chs. 1–2 |
|
5/11 |
M |
Unger chs. 3–4 |
|
5/13 |
W |
Supplement ##6–7 |
|
5/18 |
M |
Supplement ##4,
8, 9 |
|
5/21 |
W |
Unger chs. 5–6;
Supplement #11 |
|
5/25 |
M |
MEMORIAL DAY—NO
CLASS |
|
5/27 |
W |
Unger chs. 7–8;
Supplement ##1–3 |
|
6/1 |
M |
Unger ch. 9 |
|
6/3 |
W |
Review |
3. Required materials
J. Marshall Unger, Ideogram: Chinese characters and the myth of
disembodied meaning (
John DeFrancis, The Chinese language: fact and fantasy (Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 1984).
(Both ordered at SBX.)
Supplement to Ideogram (available on-line through CARMEN); selections number 0 to 14.
Marshall McLuhan, The Medium is the Massage (audio recording available on-line through CARMEN)
4. Recommended titles
|
Peter T. Daniels, William Bright |
The world's writing systems |
P211 .W714 1996 |
|
John DeFrancis |
Visible speech: the diverse oneness of writing systems |
P211 .D36 1989 |
|
John DeFrancis |
Colonialism and language policy in |
JQ820.L3 D43 1977 |
|
Hubert L. Dreyfus |
What computers still can't do: a critique of artificial reason |
Q335 .D74 1992 |
|
Umberto Eco |
The search for the perfect language |
P106 .E2813 1995 |
|
Mary S. Erbaugh (ed.) |
Difficult characters: interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing |
Available in pbk at Foreign Language Publications, Hagerty Hall |
|
Nanette [Twine] Gottlieb |
Kanji politics: language policy and Japanese script |
BL524.73 .G68 1995 |
|
Nanette [Twine] Gottlieb |
Word-processing technology in |
Z52.4 .G68 2000 |
|
Wm. C. Hannas |
|
PL1171 .H37 1997 |
|
Roy Harris |
Signs, language, and communication: integrational and segregational approaches |
P90 .H384 1996 |
|
Roy Harris |
Signs of writing |
P211 .H353 1995 |
|
Joseph F. Kess, Tadao Miyamoto |
The Japanese mental lexicon: psycholinguistic studies of kana and kanji processing |
PL513 .K46 1999 |
|
Young-Key Kim-Renaud |
The Korean alphabet: its history and structure |
PL918 .K67 1997 |
|
Robert K. Logan |
The alphabet effect: the impact of the phonetic alphabet on the development of Western civilization |
P211 .L73 1986 |
|
Ken Lunde |
CJKV [Chinese-Japanese- Korean-Vietnamese] information processing |
PL1074.5 .L86 1999 |
|
Victor H. Mair, Yongquan Liu (eds.) |
Characters and computers |
PL1074.5 .C372 1991 |
|
Jerome L. Packard |
The morphology of Chinese: a linguistic and cognitive approach |
P1230 .P34 2000 |
|
Michel Paradis, Hiroko Hagiwara, Nancy Hildebrandt |
Neurolinguistic aspects of the Japanese writing system |
RC394.W6 P37 1985 |
|
Geoffrey Sampson |
Writing systems: a linguistic introduction |
P211 .S36 |
|
Christopher Seeley |
A history of writing in |
PL545 .S35 1991 |
|
Richard Sproat |
A computational theory of writing systems |
P211.4 .S67 2000 |
|
Insup Taylor, David R. Olson (eds.) |
Scripts and literacy: reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries, and characters |
P211 .S42 1995 |
|
Insup Taylor, M. Martin Taylor |
Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese |
PL1171 .T37 1995 |
|
Michael Toolan |
Total speech: an integrational linguistic approach to language |
P106 .T666 1996 |
|
Nanette Twine |
Language and the modern state: the reform of written Japanese |
PL525.6 .T95 1991 |
|
J. Marshall Unger |
The fifth generation fallacy: why |
QA76.85 .U54 1987 |
|
J. Marshall Unger |
Literacy and script reform in occupation |
PL549 .U45 1996 |
5. General Reminders
Disability
Services
Students with disabilities that have been certified by
the Office for Disability Services will be appropriately accommodated, and
should inform the instructor as soon as possible of their needs. The Office for
Disability Services is located in 150 Pomerene Hall,
http://www.ods.ohio-state.edu
Academic
Misconduct
“It is the responsibility of the Committee on Academic
Misconduct to investigate or establish procedures for the investigation of all
reported cases of student academic misconduct. The term ‘academic misconduct’
includes all forms of student academic misconduct wherever committed;
illustrated by, but not limited to, cases of plagiarism and dishonest practices
in connection with examinations. Instructors shall report all instances of
alleged academic misconduct to the committee.”
(Faculty Rule 3335-5-487) For additional information, access the Code of
Student Conduct at
http://studentaffairs.osu.edu/resource_csc.asp
Last Updated 10 April 2009 by J. Marshall Unger