|
|
The history of Indo-European is often schematized in the form of a tree. Controversies abound as to exactly what the tree should look like (and even if a tree is the most appropriate representation). Even so, a good deal of credible archeological work suggests the following interpretation. About six thousand years ago people spoke a language now termed Proto-Indo-European in an area that today constitutes the southern part of Ukraine as well as, perhaps, parts of southern Russia. In the next two thousand years speakers of Indo-European migrated in different directions, some moving east and some moving west: the division is often represented as the centum and satem branches on the tree (though there are controversies about this split). Those who moved east eventually reached points as far east as India and the approaches to China, while those who migrated the farthest west reached the areas known today as Spain and the British Isles. Those migrants who reached India probably had ancestors who passed through Iran and Afghanistan, and the word designating the former is thought by some to be a name for Indo-Europeans more generally. Some of those who reached Spain, Britain, and Ireland spoke Celtic languages, while the Germanic languages directly ancestral to English were probably first spoken in what today are Denmark, Sweden, and the northern part of Germany.
|
|
Some archeologists believe that the development of horsemanship led to an economic change, allowing for small groups of people to move large herds of sheep and other animals to wider and wider areas. Some feminist scholars such as Marija Gimbutas believe that the passing of a matriarchal Old Europe reliant on agriculture coincides with the arrival of patriarchal Indo-Europeans reliant on herding. In any case, the pastoralists left behind some intriguing monuments of their power: kurgans, which are burial mounds similar in some ways to those built by Native Americans.
One commonplace has it that "History is written in the footsteps of the horse." The spread of the Indo-Europeans seems to support that, and their development of horsemanship eventually spread to groups who spoke non-Indo-European languages yet who also influenced history in major ways: for example, the Huns, Turks, and Mongols. Moreover, myths that developed in this equestrian culture spread far beyond the original Indo-European homeland. For example, an early account of the invasion of Britain by the Anglo-Saxons identifies two of their leaders as Hengest and Horsa. The former name is a term for ‘stallion,’ and the names reflect the myth of horse twins found in other Indo-European societies (e.g., Castor and Pollux in ancient Greece).
|
|
Source for this page: In Search of the Indo-Europeans, by J.P. Mallory. London: Thames and Hudson, 1989.