English 876: Studies in Critical Theory

Feminist Theory and the Problem of Aesthetics

Autumn 2003

Professor Marlene Longenecker

Office: Denney 405

Office Hours: TR 12-1 and by appointment

Phone 292-6114 (voice mail)

Longenecker.2@osu.edu

Course Description

“Rabdindranath Tagore, the Indian poet, composer of the Indian national anthem and compulsive world traveler, is said to have cried at the sheer ‘barbarian ugliness’ when he first saw the Parthenon.”  Mary Beard, The Parthenon

In the last 25 years, much cutting edge critical theory (marxist, multicultural, postcolonial, feminist) has either avoided the problem of aesthetics or has deconstructed the aesthetic as always already patriarchal, reactionary, racist, elitist.  But more recently, there have been attempts to reclaim the aesthetic, to reinvestigate its emancipatory potential.  This course will be organized around both the critique and the recovery of aesthetic questions for feminism.   This will necessarily involve us in a cluster of interesting questions: Are all of women’s efforts at (self) beautification inevitably implicated in patriarchal structures of desire?  Is there anything useful to be learned from the 1970’s questions of aesthetics and identity (e.g.: is there a female/feminine/lesbian/or feminist aesthetic?  Is there a “black” aesthetic”?  A “white” aesthetic? ) Are aesthetic values always bound to class and class privilege? (Does “taste” always imply “rich”?)  As we have stretched the canon, we have often excluded aesthetic criteria; do we have to?  Why? What would happen if we didn’t?  How has aesthetic theory affected the disabled body?  Is sexist (or racist) art (e.g. pornography) evil?  Can art be evil (theorists from Shelley to Sartre would say, no)?  If women have appropriated the “gaze,” is it an aesthetic gaze, and if so, is this a good or a bad thing?  Is it possible to reclaim the aesthetic in a feminist/postmodern context? 

Required Texts and Technologies

There are two texts ordered at the bookstores:

John Berger, Ways of Seeing (Penguin, 1972)

Isobel Armstrong, The Radical Aesthetic (Blackwell, 2000)

The rest of the reading assignments are available from the University Libraries On-Line Reserve Service.  The good news is that this means the entire reading packet (around 500 pages) is free; the bad news is that it is in the form of PDF files which can take a long time to download and print if you have a slow modem.  If you do this on campus, it will generally be faster.  If you cannot be bothered, I have a copy of the reading packet available to be copied at your expense.  To access the electronic reserves web page from off-campus: 1) Libraries Main Web Page at http://www.lib.ohio-state.edu/  2) Click on About Us  3) Click on Library Units  4) Click on Circulation Department  5) Click on Reserves  6) Click on Electronic Reserves.  From any on-campus computer, you can get there much faster through Oscar.  I have also put a link to the Library’s web page on the course web site on WebCT.  Do note that many of the assigned essays for this course include visual images, which don’t always print well from PDF files, so take the time to look at them on the screen as well. 

You will need to access WebCT for this course.  For those of you new to Ohio State:  you will need your OSU User Name (e.g. Longenecker.2) and your password (the one you use to access e-mail.)  If you are enrolled in the course, your access to WebCT will be activated after the first class meets. 

Course Requirements

1.  Of course, you will read everything and come to class with scintillating and provocative comments and questions.

2.  You will sign up to present a 2-3-page position paper and lead off the discussion for one day during the quarter.  I need a list of your preferred dates (in order of preference) by Tues Sept 30.  Presentations will be during classes on Oct 2 through Nov 6. 

3.  The last four full days of class time are devoted to your final projects.  What I want you to do is to select a text (literary or visual) that you believe manifests a problem you would like to investigate related to the intersection of gender and aesthetics.  For example: a literary text that has major aesthetic flaws but which you feel should still be part of the “new” canon.  Or, one that presents us with major aesthetic challenges resulting from gender, cultural, class, and/or racial differences.  Or, one that is aesthetically seductive but politically damaging.  Or, one for which rather grand claims are now being made but which doesn’t quite seem worth all the attention.  Or, one that was once considered fabulous and now isn’t.  Or one that seems to demand some new sense of the boundary between high and low culture.  Or, one that plays with aesthetics in a new way.  Or. . . .you get the picture.   I am assuming that most of you will find a text that matters to you in your various fields of expertise, but it can be anything that really interests you.  You will assign the class some reading from it (or, if it is a visual text, I will post it on WebCT) by Thursday, November 6, and you will have half an hour to present it to the class.  (Some of you will have to do this before Thanksgiving, but that just means you have less work to do at the very end.)  I will talk more about this as we go along, but I encourage you to begin to think about it at the beginning of the quarter.  

Reading Assignments

Thurs Sept 25                Introductions

Tues Sept 30                 Definitions 

                                    Carolyn Korsmeyer, “Perceptions, Pleasures, Arts: Considering Aesthetics” (from Philosophy in a Feminist Voice)  [22pp]

                                    George Levine: “Reclaiming the Aesthetic” (from Aesthetics and Ideology) [24pp]

Thurs Oct 2                   Feminism and “Traditional” Aesthetics 

                                    Mary Poovey, “Aesthetics and Political Economy in the Eighteenth Century: The Place of Gender in the Social Constitution of Knowledge” (from Aesthetics and Ideology) [19pp]

                                    Naomi Schor, “Gender: In the Academy” (from Reading in Detail)[10pp]       

                                    Regenia Gagnier, “A Critique of Practical Aesthetics” (from Aesthetics and Ideology) [18pp]

Tues Oct 7                     Gender and the “Picturesque”: The Legacy of Landscape Aesthetics 

Christine Battersby, “Gender and the Picturesque: Recording the Ruins in the Landscape of Patriarchy”  (from Public Bodies, Private States) [16pp] Janet Brettle: Images on WebCT

Elizabeth Bohls, “Landscape Aesthetics and the Paradox of the Female Picturesque” (from Women Travel Writers and the Language of Aesthetics) [11pp] 

Ann Bermingham, “The Picturesque and Ready to Wear Femininity” (from The Politics of the Picturesque) [32pp]

Thurs Oct 9                   Theorizing the Gaze

                                    John Berger, Ways of Seeing, as much as possible but

especially Chapters 3 and 5

Laura Mulvey, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” (from          

Visual and Other Pleasures) [13pp]

bell hooks,  “The Oppositional Gaze: Black Female Spectators” (from Feminism and Tradition in Aesthetics)  [16pp]

Tues Oct 14                   Institutionalizing the Gaze:  The Museum

Carol Duncan, “The MoMa’s Hot Mamas” (from Aesthetics: The Big Questions) [11pp]

Donna Haraway, "Teddy Bear Patriarchy: Taxidermy in the Garden of Eden, New York City, 1908-1936" (From Cultures of United States Imperialism) [37pp]

                                    Timothy Luke, “Memorializing Mass Murder: The United

States Holocaust Museum” (from Museum Politics) [28pp]

Thurs Oct 16                  Femininity: The Domestic Aesthetic

                                    Susan Glaspell, “A Jury of Her Peers”  [17pp]

Alice Walker, “In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens”  [7pp]

Judy Chicago, The Dinner Party (images on WebCT)

                                    Michele Barrett, “Feminism and Cultural Politics” (from Imagination in Theory) [16pp]

                                    Berthe Morisot and Mary Cassatt (images on WebCT)

Griselda Pollock, “Modernity and the Spaces of Femininity”            

                                    (from Aesthetics—the Oxford Reader) [9pp]

Tues Oct 21                   “Feminine” Shopping:  The Aesthetics of Consumer Culture

                                    Kathy Peiss, “Making Up, Making Over: Cosmetics, Consumer Culture, and Women’s Identity” (from The Sex of Things) [21pp]

                                    Diana Fuss, “Fashion and the Homospectatorial Look” (from Critical Inquiry, 18)  [24pp]

                                    Angela Davis, “Afro Images: Politics, Fashion, Nostalgia” (from The Angela Davis Reader) [6pp]

                                    Caren Kaplan, "'A World Without Boundaries': The Body Shop's Trans/National Geographics" (from With Other Eyes)  [13pp]

                                    Rosalind Coward, “Naughty But Nice: Food Pornography” (from British Feminist Thought)  [4pp]

Thurs Oct 23                  The Aesthetics of Othering:  (Neo) Colonialism and Tourism

                                    Anne McClintock, "The Lay of the Land: Genealogies of Imperialism” (from Imperial Leather)  [52pp]

                                    Cynthia Enloe, “On the Beach: Sexism and Tourism” (from Bananas, Beaches, and Bases)  [10pp]       

                                    Judith Williamson, “Woman is an Island: Femininity and

                                    Colonization” (from Studies in Entertainment) [17pp]

                                    Christopher Steiner, "Authenticity, Repetition, and the Aesthetics of Seriality: The Work of Tourist Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" (from Unpacking Culture)  [15pp]

Tues Oct 28                   Aesthetics, Multiculturalism, Identity Politics

                                    Michele Wallace, “Modernism, Postmodernism, and the Problem of the Visual in Afro-American Culture”

(from Aesthetics: The Big Questions) [12pp]

Sarah Ramirez, "Borders, Feminism, and Spirituality: Movements in Chicana Aesthetic Revisioning" (from Decolonial Voices) [16pp]

Elizabeth Cook-Lynn, “End of the Failed Metaphor” (from Why I Can’t Read Wallace Stegner) [8pp]

Gargi Chatterjee and Augie Tan, “Is There An Asian American Aesthetics?”  (from Contemporary Asian America) [9pp]

Gail Sweeney, “The King of White Trash Culture: Elvis

Presley and the Aesthetics of Excess” (from White Trash) [14pp]

Thurs Oct 30                  Is it Art?  Pornography

                                    Catherine MacKinnon, “Frances Biddle’s Sister: Pornography, Civil Rights, and Speech” (from Feminism Unmodified) [33pp]

                                    Wendy Steiner, “The Perfect Moment” and “Conclusion” (from The Scandal of Pleasure: Art in an Age of Fundamentalism) [54pp]

                                    Kobena Mercer, “Just Looking for Trouble—Robert Mapplethorpe and Fantasies of Race” (from Studying Culture) [12pp]

Tues Nov 4                    Body Matters

                                    Peg Brand, “Bound to Beauty: An Interview with Orlan” (from Beauty Matters) [22pp]

                                    Anita Silvers, “From the Crooked Timber of Humanity, Beautiful Things Can Be Made” (from Beauty Matters) [22pp]

                                    Janice Boddy, “Violence Embodied?  Circumcision, Gender Politics, and Cultural Aesthetics” (from Rethinking Violence Against Women) [28pp]          

Thurs Nov 6                   Feminist Aesthetics? 

                                    Marilyn French, “Is There a Feminist Aesthetic?” (from Aesthetics in Feminist Prespective) [8pp]

                                    Sue-Ellen Case, "Toward a Butch-Femme Aesthetic" (from Camp) [15pp]

                                    Josephine Donovan, “Everyday Use and Moments of Being: Toward a Nondominative Aesthetic” (from Aesthetics in Feminist Perspective) [11pp] 

                                    Tania Modleski, “The Search for Tomorrow in Today’s Soap Operas” (from Feminist Television Criticism)  [11pp]

                                    Rita Felski, “Why Feminism Doesn’t Need an Aesthetic (and Why It Can’t Ignore Aesthetics)” (from Doing Time) [15pp]

Tues Nov 11                   Veteran’s Day—No Class

Thurs Nov 13                 Where Are We Now? Feminist Aesthetics/Postmodern Aesthetics?

Isobel Armstrong, The Radical Aesthetic, Parts I and II

Tues Nov 18                  Feminist Aesthetics/Postmodern Aesthetics, continued

                                    Armstrong, Parts III and IV 

Thurs Nov 20                 Student Presentations: Case Studies

Tues Nov 25                  Student Presentations: Case Studies

Thurs Nov 27                 Happy Thanksgiving

Tues Dec 2                    Student Presentations: Case Studies

Thurs Dec 4                   Student Presentations: Case Studies