English 398: Critical Writing

Assignment for Paper #1, due Thursday, October 4

For some general guidelines for composing your essay, please visit the following page:
http://people.cohums.ohio-state.edu/herman145/papertemplate.html

This assignment is designed to familiarize you with New Criticism; the assignment asks you to bring techniques of close reading to bear on Ibsen's A Doll's House (read pp. 537-540 and 819-878 of Landy and Allen). To complete this assignment, choose a scene from Ibsen's play that you find particularly significant (for example, because of its content, themes, imagery, symbolism, etc.) and develop a 1,000-word close reading of the scene and its significance in the context of the play. Please double-space your essay and use your computer's word-count function to check the exact number of words. List the number of words at the end of your essay, making sure that it is within 10% of the target length (900-1,000 words).

Because our focus in the first part of the course is on how to use the approach known as New Criticism to develop interpretations of texts, you should go back and reread chapter 3 of Lynn's Texts and Contexts before starting on your essay. Pay especially close attention to pages 46-55 of the chapter, where Lynn walks you through the process of writing about a literary text using key New Critical ideas. In particular, I'd like you to focus on the three steps he discusses on page 46. Further, I'd suggest that you try to pursue these steps in one of two ways.

One way is to look for complexities of the kind Lynn describes (tensions, ironies, paradoxes, oppositions, ambiguities) in the scene itself, and then discuss how the larger idea or ideas unifying the play as a whole allow us to resolve those tensions. Here you would be discussing how the complexities evident in the scene help illuminate the larger idea(s) of the play as a whole, while also showing how the larger idea(s) help us put the scene's complexities or internal tensions into a broader context and make sense of them as parts of that context. The other way to follow the steps would be to explore tensions between the play taken as a whole and the specific scene that you are examining. In other words, does the scene itself seem to conflict with or be in tension with the play's other parts? Does something that happens in the scene (or something that one of the characters says) seem to stand in a paradoxical relation to what goes on in the rest of the play? If so, can you identify in the work as a whole a larger idea or unifying theme that allows you to resolve this apparent conflict or tension, and to interpret the scene you are discussing as a part connected organically to Ibsen's larger design?