|
| |
Formative
Experiences, 1959-1976

I
grew up in Raleigh, North Carolina. The city isn't far from Fort Bragg at
Fayetteville, about forty miles south. I had several friends whose fathers
served on the post. The tone of the time was one of unreflective
patriotism. At school we raised the flag each day to the tune of "To the
Colors." In music class we learned to sing "The Green Beret Hymn."
(Fighting soldiers / from the sky / fearless men / who jump and die, etc.)
The earliest television programs I can remember watching were westerns like
"Rawhide" and "Wagon Train," but not far behind them was Combat,
a fairly gritty--for the time--drama about the men of "King Two;" i.e., the
second platoon of Company K in an unspecified infantry battalion. In a sense, it
presaged by thirty years the HBO mini-series "Band of Brothers," in that it
followed the platoon from D-Day through its advance across western Europe. The
show ran from 1962 until 1967. I would therefore have been three years old when
it began, eight when it ended. I don't remember all that much about it except for
the series' central character, Sergeant Saunders (Vic Morrow).
Among the first books I can recall reading--aside from Sally, Dick and Jane--was
one called Great Fighter Pilots of World War II. I also read a
version of Richard Tregaski's Guadalcanal Diary done for young people.
As time went on, I read a lot of military history. And yes, I once
received an Army uniform for Christmas and had toy guns, even a toy .30 caliber
Browning machine gun.
Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in August 1964, two months before
my fifth birthday. From the next ten years I grew up on images of the
Vietnam War, which regularly clashed with the image of war I had from John Wayne
films a TV series like Combat. In third grade I remember that my teacher,
Miss Drake, leaving class abruptly to comfort a teacher across the hall whose
husband had just shipped out for Vietnam. We kids couldn't understand why
the teacher was upset. We thought the natural reaction would be pride.
We didn't have a clue. Miss Drake was one of the more understanding
teachers I had, but I remember that her reaction to our reaction was clipped,
almost annoyed.
It
goes almost without saying that my favorite war film during this period was
Patton, winner of numerous
Academy awards in 1970: Best Film, Best Director, Best Actor (which George
C. Scott refused), and Best Screenplay (penned by Francis Ford Coppola, who went
on to direct the Godfather saga and Apocalypse Now). It
really is a good film. But like nearly all such movies, it makes war seem
neat. Further, its focus on command plays right into the way most buffs
mentally position themselves when they think about war. They're nearly
always arm chair generals at heart.
(Click image for a few seconds of the
main track from Patton, albeit in that wienie sounding MIDI format)
I
can't remember a time when I wasn't reading some book on military history.
But the event that really changed my life occurred when I was twelve, and picked
up a copy of Bruce Catton's A Stillness at Appomattox that, for some
reason, was just lying around the house. The book was the concluding volume of Catton's Army of the Potomac trilogy. I knew nothing of that. But
the back cover told me the book had won the 1954 Pulitzer Prize, and my own
reading opened up the world of the Civil War. (A critic once observed that
"Catton writes like he owned the Civil War. It could not be in better
hands.") Since then, I've met a lot of people whose passion is the Civil
War. A surprising number trace their interest back to A Stillness at
Appomattox.
That was in 1972.
Two years later I had read a good deal on the war, and since I was already
working beyond my grade level, my ninth grade English teacher, Billie Cranford,
gave me the option to pursue an independent writing project. I decided to
write an account of the Antietam campaign. Although I completed only four
chapters of about 4,000 words each, the project was my first real attempt at
historical writing. When years later The Hard Hand of War was
published, I dedicated it to three teachers, the first of whom was Ms. Cranford.
During this same period, my younger brother and I also discovered war-gaming, especially those published by Avalon Hill. There's no telling how many hours we spent playing them. Of the two of us, he was somewhat better because he better exploited the rules and the "grain" of the board--these games used hexagons rather than squares because "hexes" permitted movement in six directions, not just four. I tended to do only what made sense historically.
Still, we were both pretty good, and these games taught me the basic vocabulary of operational military history, a lesson I've drawn upon ever since. And on at least one college midterm, the experience of having played France 1940 actually supplied me with the wherewithal I needed to write an "A" essay. 
Return to
The Making of a Military Historian
Continue to Kent State
| |
|