|Interrogating the Project of Military History|
November 30 - I show a lot of film clips in my History of War course. Most large classrooms at Ohio State now have an excellent multimedia capability, and I've acquired a large collection of VHS tapes and DVDs, so it's easy to do. I choose some film clips to illustrate a concept that might otherwise be hard to get across; e.g., the many forms that war can take and the difficulty of defining it. Others make it possible to visualize things--a Roman manipular legion, for instance. But most frequently I use the clips to convey what historian Bruce Catton called an "emotional understanding" of the subject under discussion.
"We are not yet wholly rational beings," Catton suggested. "We approach true understanding through our emotions rather than our intellects. . . . Except for the dedicated student, nobody in particular cares to know more than is already known of (to take a case at random) the great battle of Gettysburg; but the man who can make us feel and see that stupendous fight will get our attention because he helps us to comprehend the enormous intangibles which were involved there. Those intangibles . . . reveal themselves most clearly to those whose feelings and imaginations have been touched. They come in moments of insight born of emotional understanding."
Today I was trying to get across to students two ideas. First, the way in which American novels and films during the 1950s and 60s consistently used the trope--though I didn't use that word--of Americans venturing into Asia, confident of their understanding and their ability to control events, only to have that confidence mocked and eventually overwhelmed by the real complexities of that vast region. Second, the concept of "blowback," a term coined by the CIA to describe the unintended adverse consequences of a covert operation and used by political scientist Chalmers Johnson to describe the unintended adverse consequences of American foreign policy in general.
In the weeks after 9/11 I tried to illustrate the concept of blowback to the students in my upper-division U.S. military history survey. I pointed out such things as the way in which the War with Mexico unleashed the chain of events that led directly to the American Civil War, but the centerpiece of my effort was a 13-minute excerpt from the 1966 film The Sand Pebbles, starring Steve McQueen. I've written about this elsewhere, and it captures what took place in class today:
The creation of an informal empire [ca. 1898] led to powerful new instances of
China makes a good example. Initially the United States sought only to have free
access to the potentially lucrative China market, but chronic political
instability in China induced the U.S. to join with European powers to impose
Unsurprisingly, the Chinese bitterly resented it.
At this point I showed the class a film clip from
Pebbles. Set in 1926 China, the film depicts the crew of the Navy gunboat
U.S.S. San Pablo caught up in the turmoil of the Chinese revolution. Like
her captain, Lieutenant Collins (Richard Crenna), the crew takes it for granted
that China is essentially a land of "coolies," incapable of self-government.
The portion of the screenplay depicting Po-han's death is available here. The complete script is available at The Sand Pebbles, an astonishingly extensive web site devoted to the film.
Continue to next page (link not yet active)
Return to main page