Documentary analysis paper

You need to write a short, focused analysis of a documentary of your choice (something we have not viewed or listened to as a part of this class).  My preference would be for you to choose a file that you can screen more than once in a controlled setting: rent a video, watch a film on television, or listen to a program online or on the radio.  Choosing a quality documentary will be key. 

I am looking for a traditional piece of academic writing for this assignment, one that follows the conventions you are used to following in your other courses. Those smaller issues might include format and documentation (I prefer MLA, but if you are used to writing within a different system, I am fine with that, too). I am looking for a 3-4 page paper. You do not need to include outside sources if you can carry this analysis without, but if you do, you must cite those sources correctly. I do require that the documentary you are writing about is included in a bibliography. Larger issues might include appropriateness style and tone, but I am more interested in you taking a critical stance on a fairly narrow topic. I do not believe that all good academic writing has a clearly articulated thesis at the conclusion of the introduction, but such an approach often allows readers and writers to understand "a critical stance on a fairly narrow topic." At the very least, you should have this thesis in mind. My working definition of "thesis" is: A position that demands further exploration and defense. As you are writing, you should carefully consider how you use plot summary. I am *not* interested in papers that are heavy on plot summary. Instead, you should use plot summary to further your critical examination of the film.

In short, I will expect that you exhibit the writing skills expected of a student enrolled in a 500-level English course.

Your documentary analysis paper is due Thursday, 9 November 2006 at 5:30pm.